PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Christopher Pallis
TI  - Danish ethics council rejects brain death as the criterion of death -- commentary 2: return to Elsinore.
AID  - 10.1136/jme.16.1.10
DP  - 1990 Mar 01
TA  - Journal of Medical Ethics
PG  - 10--13
VI  - 16
IP  - 1
4099  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/16/1/10.short
4100  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/16/1/10.full
SO  - J Med Ethics1990 Mar 01; 16
AB  - No discussion of when an individual is dead is meaningful in the absence of a definition of death. If human death is defined as the irreversible loss of the capacity for consciousness combined with the irreversible loss of the capacity to breathe spontaneously (and hence to maintain a spontaneous heart beat) the death of the brainstem will be seen to be the necessary and sufficient condition for the death of the individual. Such a definition of death is not something radically new. It is merely the reformulation -- in the language of the neurophysiologist -- of much older concepts such as the 'departure of the (conscious) soul from the body' and the 'loss of the breath of life'. All death -- in this perspective -- is, and always has been, brainstem death....