Article Text
Abstract
This research aims to examine access to medical treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic for people living with disabilities. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the practical and ethical problems of allocating limited medical resources such as intensive care unit beds and ventilators became critical. Although different countries have proposed different guidelines to manage this emergency, these proposed criteria do not sufficiently consider people living with disabilities. People living with disabilities are therefore at a higher risk of exclusion from medical treatments as physicians tend to assume they have poor quality of life, whereas access to medical treatment should be based on several parameters, including clinical data and prognosis. However, the COVID-19 pandemic shifts the medical paradigm from person-centred medicine to community-centred medicine, challenging the main ethical theories. We reviewed the main guidelines and recommendations for resources allocation and examined their position toward persons with disabilities. Based on our findings, we propose criteria for not discriminating against people with disabilities in allocating resources. The shift from person-centred to community-centred medicine offers opportunities but also risks sacrificing the most vulnerable people. The principle of reasonable accommodation must always be considered to guarantee the rights of persons with disabilities.
- disability
- COVID-19
- allocation of health care resources
- clinical ethics
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.
https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usageStatistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Footnotes
Contributors NP: conception and design of paper; drafting the article or revising it; providing intellectual content of critical importance to the work described; and final approval of the version to be published. VD: conception and design of study; drafting the article or revising it; and final approval of the version to be published. SC, ELP, MB, MLS and FG: drafting the article or revising it; providing intellectual content of critical importance to the work described; and final approval of the version to be published.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- What is fair? Ethical analysis of triage criteria and disability rights during the COVID-19 pandemic and the German legislation
- Whose life to save? Scarce resources allocation in the COVID-19 outbreak
- Triage and justice in an unjust pandemic: ethical allocation of scarce medical resources in the setting of racial and socioeconomic disparities
- Allocating scarce life-saving resources: the proper role of age
- Ethics of reallocating ventilators in the covid-19 pandemic
- Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?
- Who should get the scarce ICU bed? The US public’s view on triage in the time of COVID-19
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- National health system cuts and triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and Spain: ethical implications
- What is common and what is different: recommendations from European scientific societies for triage in the first outbreak of COVID-19