Article Text
Abstract
In ‘Psychotherapy, Placebos and Informed Consent’, I argued that the minimal standard for informed consent in psychotherapy requires that ‘patients understand that there is currently no consensus about the mechanisms of change in psychotherapy, and that the therapy on offer…is based on disputed theoretical foundations’, and that the dissemination of this information is compatible with the delivery of many theory-specific forms of psychotherapy (including cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)). I also argued that the minimal requirements for informed consent do not include information about the role of therapeutic common factors in healing (eg, expectancy effects and therapist effects); practitioners may discuss the common factors with patients, but they are not part of the ‘core set’ of information necessary to obtain informed consent.
In a recent reply, Charlotte Blease criticises these two arguments by claiming they are not supported by empirical findings about the therapeutic common factors. Blease’s response is based on serious misunderstandings of both CBT and what the common factor findings actually find. Nevertheless, addressing the reasons for these misunderstandings is instructive and gives us an opportunity to clarify what, exactly, needs to be explained to patients in order to obtain informed consent for psychotherapy.
- informed consent
- psychiatry
- psychotherapy
- paternalism
- psychology
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors GL is the sole author of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Psychotherapy, placebos, and informed consent
- Psychotherapy is still failing patients: revisiting informed consent—a response to Garson Leder
- Talking more about talking cures: cognitive behavioural therapy and informed consent
- Cost and outcome of behavioural activation versus cognitive behavioural therapy for depression (COBRA): a qualitative process evaluation
- Cognitive behavioural therapy in groups for medicated adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Efficacy of antidepressants and psychological therapies in irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Fortnightly review: Cognitive behaviour therapy–clinical applications
- Two-group randomised, parallel trial of cognitive and exposure therapies for problem gambling: a research protocol
- Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy augmentation in major depression treatment (ECAM study): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
- Cognitive–behavioural therapy for non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: a clinical review