Article Text
Abstract
The debate over risk-related standards of decisional capacity remains one of the most important and unresolved challenges to our understanding of the demands of informed consent. On one hand, risk-related standards benefit from significant intuitive support. On the other hand, risk-related standards appear to be committed to asymmetrical capacity—a conceptual incoherence. This latter objection can be avoided by holding that risk-related standards are the result of evidential considerations introduced by (i) the reasonable person standard and (ii) the standing assumption that patients have capacity. This evidential approach to justifying risk-related standards of capacity avoids the most significant challenges faced by extant views while grounding risk-related standards in two fairly uncontroversial views in biomedical ethics.
- capacity
- autonomy
- informed consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors I am solely responsible for conceiving of and writing this manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Using coercion in mental disorders or risking the patient’s death? An analysis of the protocols of a clinical ethics committee and a derived decision algorithm
- Temporising and respect for patient self-determination
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- The Ulysses contract in obstetrics: a woman's choices before and during labour
- Ditching decision-making capacity
- Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent
- Obligation for transparency regarding treating physician credentials at academic health centres
- Fostering relational autonomy in end-of-life care: a procedural approach and three-dimensional decision-making model
- Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account