Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
As a neonatal neurologist, I serve families facing tragic decisions in which they must balance trade-offs between death and life with profound disability. I often find myself in complex discussions about future outcome, in which families sort through in real-time what information they value most in making such a choice. Will he laugh? Will he be in pain? Will he know how much he’s loved? In this month’s feature article, Brick et al share the results of an online survey aimed at assessing public views on when a life is not worth living, in an effort to inform ongoing legal and clinical debates about withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for children. These findings raise important questions about how we define and measure outcomes that matter to parents as they make these tragic decisions.
It is challenging to interpret these findings in the absence of context of how decision-making for infants occurs in real-time. The nature of this study and its objective required that cases be substantially simplified. As the authors acknowledge, the prognoses and function of the children involved in these cases were often deeply contested. Prognostic uncertainty is common for children with significant …
Footnotes
Contributors ML drafted and revised this manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?
- 6220 institutionalised people with intellectual disability referred for visual assessment between 1993 and 2003: overview and trends
- Transition from school to adult life for physically disabled young people
- Interventions for mental health problems in children and adults with severe intellectual disabilities: a systematic review
- Parental reasoning about growth attenuation therapy: report of a single-case study
- Predicting death or major neurodevelopmental disability in extremely preterm infants born in Australia
- Economic evaluation alongside the Premature Infants in Need of Transfusion randomised controlled trial
- Exposure to umbilical cord management approaches and death or neurodevelopmental impairment at 22–26 months’ corrected age after extremely preterm birth
- Evidence that children with special needs all require visual assessment
- #warriors: sick children, social media and the right to an open future