Article Text
Abstract
It is often claimed that medical professionals are subject to conflicting duties in their role morality. Some hold that the overridden duty taints the professional and generates a patient claim to a form of moral compensation. This paper challenges such a ‘compensation view’ of conflict and argues that it misleadingly makes the role morality into a personal contract between professional and patient. Two competing views are therefore considered. The ‘unity view’ argues that there are no real conflicts between professional duties. Hence, there can be no residual duties that are impossible to discharge and no special claim on the part of the patient. It is argued that this fails because the institutional nature of the role morality requires us to accept possibility of conflict. The paper articulates and defends a third view, where conflict triggers a professional duty of restitution. This duty is not a matter of making amends for a previous wrong, but rather a matter of rebuilding a trusting relationship that has been damaged due to blameless circumstances.
- philosophical ethics
- moral status
- health personnel
- codes of/position statements on professional ethics
- philosophy of medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Presented at The paper has benefited from the peer review, feedback at the 2017 Conference for the Norwegian Network of Professional Ethics, and discussion at the Counterfactual Union in Oslo.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A plea for end-of-life discussions with patients suffering from Huntington's disease: the role of the physician
- Taking a moral holiday? Physicians’ practical identities at the margins of professional ethics
- On the relationship between medical ethics and medical professionalism
- Moral principles and medical practice: the role of patient autonomy in the extensive use of radiological services
- Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board
- Love thy neighbour? Allocating vaccines in a world of competing obligations
- Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent
- Ethics of patient activation: exploring its relation to personal responsibility, autonomy and health disparities
- What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics
- Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views