Article Text
Abstract
Background: Although genetic research into Alzheimer disease (AD) is increasing, the ethical aspects of this kind of research and the differences between ethical issues related to genetic and non-genetic research into AD have not yet received much attention.
Objectives: (1) To identify and compare the five ethical issues considered most important by surveyed expert panellists in non-genetic and genetic AD research and (2) to compare our empirical findings with ethical issues in genetic research in general as described in the literature.
Method: A modified Delphi study in two rounds
Results: Genetic and non-genetic research into AD generated an approximately equal number of topics with a considerable overlap. Different priorities in the ethics of both types of research were found. Genetic research raised new topics such as “confidentiality of genetic information” and “implications of research for relatives” which changes the impact and application of existing ethical topics such as “informed consent” and is judged to have more impact on both individuals and society. A difference with the results of more theoretical approaches on ethical aspects related to AD research was also found.
Conclusions: Different priorities are given to ethical issues in genetic and non-genetic research. These arise partly because genetic research causes unique and new questions, mostly related to the position of family members and the status of and access to genetic information. Differences found between the results of our empirical study and the more theoretical literature, suggest an additional value for empirical research in medical ethics.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
▸ Appendices are published online only at http://jme.bmj.com/content/vol35/issue2
Funding: The work for this publication was carried out within the framework of the programme “The Societal Component of Genomics Research”, which is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). The funding organisation was not involved in any stage of this research.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of genetic testing and research in sport: a position statement from the Australian Institute of Sport
- Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants
- Ethical issues in Alzheimer’s disease research involving human subjects
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
- Collecting genetic samples and linked mental health data from adolescents in schools: protocol coproduction and a mixed-methods pilot of feasibility and acceptability
- Genetics and epigenetics of Alzheimer's disease
- Researchers’ preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain
- The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices
- Collection, storage and use of blood samples for future research: views of Egyptian patients expressed in a cross-sectional survey
- The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research