Article Text
Abstract
The right to refuse medical intervention is well established, but it remains unclear how best to respect and exercise this right in life support. Contemporary ethical guidelines for critical care give ambiguous advice, largely because they focus on the moral equivalence of withdrawing and withholding care without confronting the very real differences regarding who is aware and informed of intervention options and how patient values are communicated and enacted. In withholding care, doctors typically withhold information about interventions judged too futile to offer. They thus retain greater decision-making burden (and power) and face weaker obligations to secure consent from patients or proxies. In withdrawing care, there is a clearer imperative for the doctor to include patients (or proxies) in decisions, share information and secure consent, even when continued life support is deemed futile. How decisions to withhold and withdraw life support differ ethically in their implications for positive versus negative interpretations of patient autonomy, imperatives for consent, definitions of futility and the subjective evaluation of (and submission to) benefits and burdens of life support in critical care settings are explored. Professional reflection is required to respond to trends favouring a more positive interpretation of patient autonomy in the context of life support decisions in critical care. Both the bioethics and critical care communities should investigate the possibilities and limits of growing pressure for doctors to disclose their reasoning or seek patient consent when decisions to withhold life support are made.
- ICU, intensive care unit
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: None declared.
-
DC holds a Canada Research Chair of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study
- Ethical decision making in intensive care units: a burnout risk factor? Results from a multicentre study conducted with physicians and nurses
- Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine
- The decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-saving treatments in a children's hospital
- Ethics and decision making in end stage lung disease
- Priority dilemmas in dialysis: the impact of old age
- Perceptions of patients on the utility or futility of end-of-life treatment
- “Allow natural death” versus “do not resuscitate”: three words that can change a life
- Grasping the nettle—what to do when patients withdraw their consent for treatment: (a clinical perspective on the case of Ms B)