Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The medical profession’s role should be limited to advice and information
The medical establishment’s desire to interfere with the autonomous wishes of boxers seems at odds with the principle of respect for autonomy prevalent in contemporary biomedical practice. I argue that the role of the medical profession in boxing should be solely an advisory and informational one. In addition, the distinctions made between boxing and other high risk sports often rely on an insufficient knowledge of the sport. This leads to misdirected criticisms and excessive emphasis on the colourful discourse of boxing, as opposed to the practice of boxing itself. Dr Herrera’s claim in his article (see page 514) that boxing differs from other sports in the acceptability of its acts outside the realm of sport is refuted.1 The importance of consent as a legitimising factor is highlighted, and a number of possible solutions to improve safety within the sport are tentatively suggested.
In the United Kingdom, a competent adult may legally refuse medical treatment, irrespective of the severity of his condition or the validity of his reasons. With the pre-eminence of an autonomy based model of bioethics, respecting a patient’s wishes forms an integral part of acting in his best interests. It is puzzling, then, to find that the Australian Medical Association have called for a ban on boxing on the grounds that the activity is excessively hazardous to the health of boxers. The often mentioned principle of respect for autonomy is abandoned once the person drops the privileged title of “patient”. This suggests that being a patient …
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The search for meaningful comparisons in boxing and medical ethics
- Could boxing be banned? A legal and epidemiological perspective
- Health protection of the Olympic athlete
- Boxing, mixed martial arts, and other risky sports: is the BMA confused?
- Amateur boxing and risk of chronic traumatic brain injury: systematic review of observational studies
- A prospective cohort study of injury in amateur and professional boxing
- The ethics of boxing
- More data needed on injury risk among young elite athletes
- Compulsory brain scans and genetic tests for boxers—or should boxing be banned?
- ‘Knowing we have these rights does not always mean we feel free to use them’: athletes’ perceptions of their human rights in sport