Article Text
Clinical ethics
Consent for anaesthesia
Abstract
“Informed consent” is a legal instrument that allows individuals to define their own interests and to protect their bodily privacy. In current medical practice, patients who have consented to surgery are considered to have implied consent to anaesthesia, even though anaesthesia is associated with its own particular set of risks and consequences that are quite separate from those associated with surgery. In addition, anaesthetists often perform interventions that are the only medical treatment received by a patient. Anaesthetists, therefore, should always obtain separate consent for anaesthesia, and should regard the process of consent as a stimulus for active, fluid reciprocal discussion with patients about treatment options.
- anaesthesia
- general
- standards
- informed consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Moral principles and medical practice: the role of patient autonomy in the extensive use of radiological services
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Should healthcare professionals respect autonomy just because it promotes welfare?
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
- What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics
- Informed consent in neurosurgery—translating ethical theory into action
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor