Article Text
Abstract
The need to protect the public against the spread of communicable (infectious) disease provides a good example of the need for a commonsense approach to the use of confidential data. Laboratories need to notify different professionals in order to trace the sources of outbreaks of infection and eradicate the cause. It is often not possible to obtain consent from individual patients, given the rapid time scale required. In doing so, however, laboratory staff and others would contravene the Data Protection Act in passing on information without consent. Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act was designed to overcome barriers to research relying on data accumulated in the past and this type of public health work. But this is proving a sluggish procedure. It is an awkward solution to the problem of data use without specific consent. This problem will be overcome only when the public can have sufficient trust in safeguards that are in place to protect their safety and confidentiality so that these important activities can be pursued without specific informed consent.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Performance characteristics of the polymerase chain reaction assay to confirm clinical meningococcal disease
- Diagnosing multidrug resistant tuberculosis in Britain
- Health protection and a new strategy for combating infection in children
- Study of infectious intestinal disease in England: rates in the community, presenting to general practice, and reported to national surveillance
- Meningitis outbreak prompts review
- Pulmonary tuberculosis among political asylum seekers screened at Heathrow Airport, London, 1995–9
- The epidemiology of acute meningitis in children in England and Wales
- Syphilis: old problem, new strategy
- Control and prevention of tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: Code of Practice 2000
- Herbert Hugh John