Article info
PDFCommentary
Ethics consultation as a mental prosthesis: addressing ethical dilemmas in neuropsychiatric disorders
- Correspondence to Craig Waldence McFarland; craigmcfarland{at}college.harvard.edu
Citation
Ethics consultation as a mental prosthesis: addressing ethical dilemmas in neuropsychiatric disorders
Publication history
- Received August 1, 2024
- Accepted September 13, 2024
- First published September 27, 2024.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Process and consensus: ethical decision-making in the infertility clinic—a qualitative study
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- Drawing the line on physician-assisted death
- Threats and offers in community mental healthcare
- Ditching decision-making capacity
- Restraint in somatic healthcare: how should it be regulated?
- How should the ‘privilege’ in therapeutic privilege be conceived when considering the decision-making process for patients with borderline capacity?
- Implementing structured, multiprofessional medical ethical decision-making in a neonatal intensive care unit
- Temporising and respect for patient self-determination
- Medical maternalism: beyond paternalism and antipaternalism