Article Text
PDFCommentary
Ethics consultation as a mental prosthesis: addressing ethical dilemmas in neuropsychiatric disorders
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
X @erodbioethics
Contributors CWMcF, JP, ER and TJB were directly involved in the creation of the article. CWMcF, as the lead author, was primarily responsible for conceptualising the main thesis, conducting the initial literature review and drafting the manuscript. JP, ER and TJB assisted in the editing of the article and expanding initial ideas, ensuring clarity and coherence in the ideas presented. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work submitted.
Funding This study was funded by Lester Kissel Grant in Practical Ethics. (No Grant/Award Number to report).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Process and consensus: ethical decision-making in the infertility clinic—a qualitative study
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- Drawing the line on physician-assisted death
- Threats and offers in community mental healthcare
- Ditching decision-making capacity
- Restraint in somatic healthcare: how should it be regulated?
- How should the ‘privilege’ in therapeutic privilege be conceived when considering the decision-making process for patients with borderline capacity?
- Implementing structured, multiprofessional medical ethical decision-making in a neonatal intensive care unit
- Temporising and respect for patient self-determination
- Medical maternalism: beyond paternalism and antipaternalism