Article info
PDFCommentary
Perils of shared understanding as the goal for ethics consultation: a commentary on Delany et al
- Correspondence to Dr Marc Sørensen; marc.soerensen{at}regionh.dk
Citation
Perils of shared understanding as the goal for ethics consultation: a commentary on Delany et al
Publication history
- Received July 31, 2024
- Accepted September 8, 2024
- First published September 18, 2024.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Critical dialogue method of ethics consultation: making clinical ethics facilitation visible and accessible
- Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation
- Need for ethics support in healthcare institutions: views of Dutch board members and ethics support staff
- Exemplarist medical ethics
- Perceived comfort level of medical students and residents in handling clinical ethics issues
- Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK
- Evaluating interventions to improve ethical decision making in clinical practice: a review of the literature and reflections on the challenges posed
- Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- What is good medical ethics? A clinician's perspective
- Analogy in moral deliberation: the role of imagination and theory in ethics