Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The feature article by Delany, Feldman, Kameniar and Gillam on the deliberative structure of a local Australian clinical ethics consultation programme is important for several reasons. It underscores Walker’s ‘moral spaces’ within healthcare settings and it increases conceptual freedom in dialogue through the bottom-up approach described.1 We concur with their commitment to the advancement of this form of clinical ethics deliberation and agree with many of the notions in the article. Due to limited space, we confine our commentary to the topics of (1) the goal of consultations and (2) the didactic aspect of consultations.
We unequivocally second the authors’ critical stance towards principled resolutions and salute their wish to enhance clinicians’ moral understandings. However, our angle is somewhat different. The conceptual freedom of which they speak is, in our view, limited by the premise that clinical ethics issues must be ‘solved’ by a consensus decision. In our experience with cases, it may be more appropriate to seek mutual rather than shared understanding due to the inherent need to balance conflicting values. This approach opens for a dialogue that is not restrained by the imperative of reaching moral consensus. It may better serve to enhance the moral agency of clinical staff and it leaves the decision with …
Footnotes
Contributors All authors contributed equally.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Critical dialogue method of ethics consultation: making clinical ethics facilitation visible and accessible
- Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation
- Need for ethics support in healthcare institutions: views of Dutch board members and ethics support staff
- Exemplarist medical ethics
- Perceived comfort level of medical students and residents in handling clinical ethics issues
- Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK
- Evaluating interventions to improve ethical decision making in clinical practice: a review of the literature and reflections on the challenges posed
- Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- What is good medical ethics? A clinician's perspective
- Analogy in moral deliberation: the role of imagination and theory in ethics