Article Text
PDFCommentary
Defending genetic disenhancement in xenotransplantation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
X @philosowhal, @hurstdanielj
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Attitudes of Swedes to marginal donors and xenotransplantation
- The promise of xenotransplantation: a challenge
- Genetic disenhancement and xenotransplantation: diminishing pigs’ capacity to experience suffering through genetic engineering
- Starting clinical trials of xenotransplantation—reflections on the ethics of the early phase
- A “Queen of Hearts” trial of organ markets: why Scheper-Hughes’s objections to markets in human organs fail
- Ethics, organ donation and tax: a proposal
- 3D bioprint me: a socioethical view of bioprinting human organs and tissues
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Fidelity to the healing relationship: a medical student's challenge to contemporary bioethics and prescription for medical practice
- “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure”: exploring economic and moral subtexts of the “organ shortage” problem in public views on organ donation