Article info
PDFResponse
The unnecessary ‘more’—compared to ROPA: a reply to Mangione
- Correspondence to Jolie Zhou, History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; mz462{at}cam.ac.uk
Citation
The unnecessary ‘more’—compared to ROPA: a reply to Mangione
Publication history
- Received July 4, 2024
- Accepted July 29, 2024
- First published August 12, 2024.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: reproductive freedom and genetic kinship
- ‘Recombining’ biological motherhoods. Towards two ‘complete’ biological mothers
- Mitochondrial donation and ‘the right to know’
- Using stem cell-derived gametes for same-sex reproduction: an alternative scenario
- IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties
- The misplaced embryo: legal parenthood in ‘embryo mix-up’ cases
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Mitochondrial replacement techniques for treating infertility
- Gamete derivation from stem cells: revisiting the concept of genetic parenthood
- ‘No’ to lesbian motherhood using human nuclear genome transfer