Article info
PDFExtended essay
Non-voluntary BCI explantation: assessing possible neurorights violations in light of contrasting mental ontologies
- Correspondence to Dr Marcello Ienca, Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health; School of Social Science and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munchen, Bayern, Germany; marcello.ienca{at}tum.de
Citation
Non-voluntary BCI explantation: assessing possible neurorights violations in light of contrasting mental ontologies
Publication history
- Received December 20, 2023
- Accepted May 28, 2024
- First published August 8, 2024.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Neurorights in question: rethinking the concept of mental integrity
- Mental integrity, autonomy, and fundamental interests
- Broadening and deepening the understanding of agency in dementia
- Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesis
- Virtual reality in functional neurological disorder: a theoretical framework and research agenda for use in the real world
- A healthcare approach to mental integrity
- The principle and problem of proximity in ethics
- The ambiguous nature of epigenetic responsibility
- Responsibility as a meta-virtue: truth-telling, deliberation and wisdom in medical professionalism
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits