Article info
PDFExtended essay
Are clinicians ethically obligated to disclose their use of medical machine learning systems to patients?
- Correspondence to Dr Joshua Hatherley, Department of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; jhatherley{at}cas.au.dk
Citation
Are clinicians ethically obligated to disclose their use of medical machine learning systems to patients?
Publication history
- Received January 29, 2024
- Accepted July 26, 2024
- First published August 7, 2024.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Testimonial injustice in medical machine learning
- Epistemic virtues of harnessing rigorous machine learning systems in ethically sensitive domains
- PDMP causes more than just testimonial injustice
- Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety
- Designing AI for mental health diagnosis: challenges from sub-Saharan African value-laden judgements on mental health disorders
- Materiality and practicality: a response to - are clinicians ethically obligated to disclose their use of medical machine learning systems to patients?
- Can medical algorithms be fair? Three ethical quandaries and one dilemma
- Governing the safety of artificial intelligence in healthcare
- Machine learning for mental health diagnosis: tackling contributory injustice and epistemic oppression
- Grand rounds in methodology: key considerations for implementing machine learning solutions in quality improvement initiatives