Article Text
Abstract
I have recently offered a defence of human equality, and consequently an argument against abortion. This has been objected to by Bozzo, on the grounds that my account of human equality is unclear and could be grounded in utilitarian or Kantian ethics, that my account struggles to ground the permissibility of therapeutic abortions, and that my proposed foundation for human equality itself is parasitic on a scalar property which generates the same difficulties I am attempting to solve. I provide an account of human equality which cannot easily be grounded in utilitarianism or Kantianism, offer a variety of defences of therapeutic abortion consistent with treating the mother and child equally, and show that even if the value of humanness is ultimately grounded in a scalar quality, my argument succeeds.
- Embryos and Fetuses
- Abortion - Induced
- Human Rights
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors CM is the sole author.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and the basis of equality: a reply to Miller
- Universal declaration of human rights
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Reflections on a contemporary European tragedy
- After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live
- Equal rights—unless you are pregnant
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle
- A human right to pleasure? Sexuality, autonomy and egalitarian strategies