Article Text
Abstract
In a recent article, I argued that all humans are morally equal, and that this generates an argument against abortion. Here, I defend my argument against two objections from Räsänen: that it is possible to ground equal human value in the ability to flourish in a particular kind of way, and that being human is not, in fact, a binary property in the way needed for the argument to work. I show that this proposed criterion for grounding human value falls prey to my original argument, and that Räsänen’s attempt to conceive of subhuman entities fails.
- Abortion - Induced
- Human Rights
- Embryos and Fetuses
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors CM is the sole author of this work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Human equality arguments against abortion
- Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: a reply to Miller
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Abortion and the basis of equality: a reply to Miller
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject