Article info
Response
Compulsory vaccination protects autonomy
- Correspondence to Dr Abraham Graber, Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA; agraber{at}gmail.com
Citation
Compulsory vaccination protects autonomy
Publication history
- Received July 12, 2023
- Accepted July 20, 2023
- First published July 28, 2023.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Spoonful of honey or a gallon of vinegar? A conditional COVID-19 vaccination policy for front-line healthcare workers
- Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?
- Ethics of vaccine refusal
- From compulsory to voluntary immunisation: Italy’s National Vaccination Plan (2005–7) and the ethical and organisational challenges facing public health policy-makers across Europe
- Should vaccination status be a consideration during secondary triage?
- Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review
- No Jab, No Job? Ethical Issues in Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Personnel
- A libertarian case for mandatory vaccination
- Healthcare workers’ (HCWs) attitudes and related factors towards COVID-19 vaccination: a rapid systematic review
- Case for persuasion in parental informed consent to promote rational vaccine choices