Article info
Response
University-age vaccine mandates: reply to Lam and Nichols
- Correspondence to Dr Tracy Beth Høeg; tracy.hoeg{at}ucsf.edu
Citation
University-age vaccine mandates: reply to Lam and Nichols
Publication history
- Received April 3, 2023
- Accepted April 29, 2023
- First published May 24, 2023.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities
- Ethics of college vaccine mandates, using reasonable comparisons
- Systematic review of spontaneous reports of myocarditis and pericarditis in transplant recipients and immunocompromised patients following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination
- Reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the UK, Europe and the USA and of the scientific literature
- Acute myocarditis caused by COVID-19 disease and following COVID-19 vaccination
- Incidence, risk factors, natural history, and hypothesised mechanisms of myocarditis and pericarditis following covid-19 vaccination: living evidence syntheses and review
- Safety of heterologous primary and booster schedules with ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines: nationwide cohort study
- SARS-CoV-2 vaccine safety in adolescents with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: data from the EULAR COVAX physician-reported registry
- Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy
- Should children be vaccinated against COVID-19?