Article info
PDFOriginal research
Enhancing social value considerations in prioritising publicly funded biomedical research: the vital role of peer review
- Correspondence to Dr Katherine W Saylor, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; kwsaylor{at}pennmedicine.upenn.edu
Citation
Enhancing social value considerations in prioritising publicly funded biomedical research: the vital role of peer review
Publication history
- Received December 27, 2022
- Accepted May 8, 2023
- First published May 24, 2023.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Strategies for writing a successful National Institutes of Health grant proposal for the early-career neurointerventionalist
- NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE (R01): PA-11-148
- Grants and Contracts
- Your Idea and Your University
- Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (U54): RFA-TR-12-006
- GRANTS AND CONTRACTS
- Outcomes of National Institutes of Health Peer Review of Clinical Grant Applications
- Reconceptualising risk–benefit analyses: the case of HIV cure research
- Public interest in health data research: laying out the conceptual groundwork
- NHLBI Director Named