Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Responsibility and decision-making authority in using clinical decision support systems: an empirical-ethical exploration of German prospective professionals’ preferences and concerns
- Correspondence to Dr Florian Funer, Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; florian.funer{at}uni-tuebingen.de
Citation
Responsibility and decision-making authority in using clinical decision support systems: an empirical-ethical exploration of German prospective professionals’ preferences and concerns
Publication history
- Received November 25, 2022
- Accepted March 11, 2023
- First published May 22, 2023.
Online issue publication
December 14, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 December 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
- Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic
- Youth should decide: the principle of subsidiarity in paediatric transgender healthcare
- Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent
- Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities
- Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
- Deployment of a human-centred clinical decision support system for pulmonary embolism: evaluation of impact on quality of diagnostic decisions
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- Clinical decision support system to optimise symptom management in palliative medicine: focus group study
- Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol