Ubuntu as a complementary perspective for addressing epistemic (in)justice in medical machine learning
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors BF and MDP contributed equally to the conceptualisation and writing of the commentary.
Funding This study was supported by H2020 European Research Council (949841).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
- How to identify epistemic injustice in global health research funding practices: a decolonial guide
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome
- Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
- Knowledge from the global South is in the global South
- Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry
- What type of inclusion does epistemic injustice require?
- Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice
- Epistemic justice and feminist bioethics in global health