Article info
PDFOriginal research
Abortion restrictions: the case for conscientious non-compliance on the part of providers
- Correspondence to Dr Pierce Randall, Alden March Bioethics Institute, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA; randalp1{at}amc.edu
Citation
Abortion restrictions: the case for conscientious non-compliance on the part of providers
Publication history
- Received January 31, 2023
- Accepted April 20, 2023
- First published May 8, 2023.
Online issue publication
February 20, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 February 2024).
- Previous version (20 February 2024).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade
- Reasons, reasonability and establishing conscientious objector status in medicine
- A narrative review of challenges related to healthcare worker rights, roles and responsibilities in the provision of sexual and reproductive services in health facilities
- Not quite a doctor, but should I help? A qualitative exploration of medical students’ attitudes towards responding to medical emergencies that occur in the public domain
- Vaccine mandates for healthcare workers beyond COVID-19
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Conscientious refusals to refer: findings from a national physician survey
- A surrogate’s secrets are(n’t) safe with me: patient confidentiality in the care of a gestational surrogate
- Ethical, professional, and legal obligations in clinical practice: a series of discussion topics for postgraduate medical education Introduction and topic 1:informed consent
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes