Despite the frequent invocation of ‘false hope’ and possible related moral concerns in the context of assisted reproduction technologies, a focused ethical and conceptual problematisation of this concept seems to be lacking. We argue that an invocation of ‘false hope’ only makes sense if the fulfilment of a desired outcome (eg, a successful fertility treatment) is impossible, and if it is attributed from an external perspective. The evaluation incurred by this third party may foreclose a given perspective from being an object of hope. However, this evaluation is not a mere statistical calculation or observation based on probabilities but is dependent on several factors that should be acknowledgeable as morally relevant. This is important because it allows room for, and encourages, reasoned disagreement and moral negotiation. Accordingly, the object of hope itself, whether or not based on socially embedded desires or practices, can be a topic of debate.
- ethics- medical
- reproductive medicine
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors DA and SS contributed equally to this paper and share the responibility.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Single women’s access to egg freezing in mainland China: an ethicolegal analysis
- Using stem cell-derived gametes for same-sex reproduction: an alternative scenario
- Is it ethical to provide IVF add-ons when there is no evidence of a benefit if the patient requests it?
- Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access issues
- Getting beyond the welfare of the child in assisted reproduction
- A little bit pregnant: towards a pluralist account of non-sexual reproduction
- Gamete derivation from stem cells: revisiting the concept of genetic parenthood
- The meaning of synthetic gametes for gay and lesbian people and bioethics too
- Fatherlessness, sperm donors and ‘so what?’ parentage: arguing against the immorality of donor conception through ‘world literature’
- Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motion