Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Genealogical obscurement: mitochondrial replacement techniques and genealogical research
  1. César Palacios-González
  1. Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr César Palacios-González, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK; cesar.palaciosgonzalez{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

Mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRTs) are a new group of biotechnologies that aim to aid women whose eggs have disease-causing deleteriously mutated mitochondria to have genetically related healthy children. These techniques have also been used to aid women with poor oocyte quality and poor embryonic development, to have genetically related children. Remarkably, MRTs create humans with DNA from three sources: nuclear DNA from the intending mother and father, and mitochondrial DNA from the egg donor. In a recent publication Françoise Baylis argued that MRTs are detrimental for genealogical research via mitochondrial DNA because they would obscure the lines of individual descent. In this paper, I argue that MRTs do not obscure genealogical research, but rather that MRT-conceived children can have two mitochondrial lineages. I argue for this position by showing that MRTs are reproductive in nature and, thus, they create genealogy.

  • fertilization in vitro
  • genetic engineering
  • genetic therapy
  • gene transfer techniques
  • in vitro techniques

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @CPalaciosG

  • Contributors I am the sole author of the paper, and its guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Other content recommended for you