Article Text
PDFCommentary
Assent to research by the formerly competent: necessary and sufficient?
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @hojjatsoofi
Contributors HS is the sole author.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵It should be noted that this concept is developed primarily in relation to dementia care.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Dementia research and advance consent: it is not about critical interests
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk?
- The implausibility of response shifts in dementia patients
- Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- Pre-emptive suicide, precedent autonomy and preclinical Alzheimer disease
- Alzheimer disease and pre-emptive suicide
- Limits of advance directives in decision-making around food and nutrition in patients with dementia