Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Anna Smajdor offers a fresh perspective on why assent is morally required in research practices involving people who (are considered to) lack the capacity to consent.1 Smajdor holds that seeking (and documenting) assent can be a mechanism to recognise those who (are considered to) lack the capacity to consent as participants ‘in our moral sphere’.1 Smajdor suggests that this approach can function as a counter to the ‘reifying’ attitudes (often) taken towards people who (are judged to) lack the capacity to consent.1 Smajdor’s approach also offers novel resources to overcome what Giles Birchley characterise as ‘the problems of the binary approach to incapacity’.2
Particularly in the context of dementia research, Smajdor’s proposal can be seen as a promising direction for going beyond the conventional (primarily) ‘protective’ approach taken by research ethics committees.3 The conventional approach asks researchers to obtain autonomous authorisation from research participants and (at times, implicitly) relies on the assumption that the ability to give consent is the only autonomy-related ability or, in other words, the assumption that the inability to give consent indicates vulnerability due to non-autonomy/non-agency. But this assumption, as Smajdor notes, seems problematic. The ability to assent (or dissent) is also an autonomy-related ability. Many …
Contributors HS is the sole author.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵It should be noted that this concept is developed primarily in relation to dementia care.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Dementia research and advance consent: it is not about critical interests
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk?
- The implausibility of response shifts in dementia patients
- Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- Pre-emptive suicide, precedent autonomy and preclinical Alzheimer disease
- Alzheimer disease and pre-emptive suicide
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach