Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
In her article Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity, Anna Smajdor shows how excluding adults with impairments of capacity (AWICs) to protect them from the risks of medical research has the paradoxical effect of harming them by reifying them.1 While the medical risks of excluding vulnerable populations in general from medical research are well known, the main risk being the creation of therapeutic orphans, the risk of reifying these populations is less discussed. Hence, we commend Smajdor for introducing an essential nuance in the debate on inclusion of AWICs in medical research. We also agree with her on the importance of acquiring assent from those who cannot legally consent rather than automatically excluding them from research, as we already do in paediatric research. However, we believe that she fails to acknowledge some practical challenges already observed in paediatric research that hinder the retrieval of assent from AWICs and, consequently, their inclusion in medical research. In this commentary, we will first introduce the main challenge to using assent to include AWICs in research, that is, the fact that individuals might oscillate within the capacity spectrum. We will then provide other examples of practical obstacles to the inclusion of AWICs …
Contributors AC contributed to the design, wrote the first draft and revised the final manuscript. CG contributed to the design, provided feedback and revised the final manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- Split views among parents regarding children’s right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey
- Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study
- A critical examination of research narratives ‘rumours’ and passive community resistance in medical research
- Quantitative valuation placed by children and teenagers on participation in two hypothetical research scenarios
- Role of non-government organizations in engaging medical students in research
- Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations
- Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris
- Hearing the voices of children: self-reported information on children's experiences during research procedures: a study protocol
- Cultural considerations for informed consent in paediatric research in low/middle-income countries: a scoping review