Hersey et al have outlined a proposed ethical framework for assessing abortion policies that locates the effect of government legislation between the provider and the patient, emphasising its influence on interactions between them. They claim that their framework offers an alternative to the personal moral claims that lie behind legislation restricting abortion access. However, they fail to observe that their own understanding of reproductive justice and the principles of medical ethics are similarly predicated on their individual moral beliefs. Consequently, the conclusions obtained from their framework are also derived from their individual beliefs, and have no claim to being objective.
- Abortion - Induced
- Moral Status
- Embryos and Fetuses
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion policies at the bedside: incorporating an ethical framework in the analysis and development of abortion legislation
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade
- Towards a European code of medical ethics. Ethical and legal issues
- DeGrazia on abortion law and policy
- Medical paternalism and the fetus
- What is it to do good medical ethics? From the perspective of a practising doctor who is in Parliament
- After Roe v Wade: US doctors are harassed, confused, and fearful, and maternal morbidity is increasing
- Clinician responses to legal requests for hastened death: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research