Article info
PDFResponse
TREs are still not about trust
- Correspondence to Dr Mackenzie Graham, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; mackenzie.graham{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
TREs are still not about trust
Publication history
- Received February 20, 2023
- Accepted February 27, 2023
- First published March 14, 2023.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Trust and the Goldacre Review: why trusted research environments are not about trust
- Verification and trust in healthcare
- Trusted research environments are definitely about trust
- Data for sale: trust, confidence and sharing health data with commercial companies
- Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: data resource
- Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust
- Infrastructure and operating processes of PIONEER, the HDR-UK Data Hub in Acute Care and the workings of the Data Trust Committee: a protocol paper
- Making consent for electronic health and social care data research fit for purpose in the 21st century
- Ethics briefing