Article info
PDFFeature article
Patients, doctors and risk attitudes
- Correspondence to Dr Nicholas Makins, Department of Philosophy, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK; ndmakins{at}gmail.com
Citation
Patients, doctors and risk attitudes
Publication history
- Received September 26, 2022
- Accepted February 25, 2023
- First published March 10, 2023.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The potential use of decision analysis to support shared decision making in the face of uncertainty: the example of atrial fibrillation and warfarin anticoagulation
- Why high-risk, non-expected-utility-maximising gambles can be rational and beneficial: the case of HIV cure studies
- Choosing the surgical mortality threshold for high risk patients with stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer: insights from decision analysis
- Patient and family involvement in decision making for management of cancer patients at a centre in Singapore
- Ethics and decision making in end stage lung disease
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Are more experienced clinicians better able to tolerate uncertainty and manage risks? A vignette study of doctors in three NHS emergency departments in England
- Temporising and respect for patient self-determination
- Prehospital emergency care in a humanitarian environment: an overview of the ethical considerations
- Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed-methods pilot study