Article Text
Abstract
There is an ongoing debate about whether multifetal pregnancy reduction from twins to singletons (2-to-1 MFPR) is morally permissible. By applying the all or nothing problem to the cases of reducing twin pregnancies to singletons, Räsänen argues that an implausible conclusion seems to follow from two plausible claims: (1) it is permissible to have an abortion and (2) it is wrong to abort only one fetus in a twin pregnancy. The implausible conclusion is that women considering 2-to-1 MFPR for social reasons ought to abort both fetuses rather than just one. To avoid the conclusion, Räsänen suggests that it is best to carry both fetuses to term and give one for adoption. In this article, I argue that Räsänen’s argument fails for two reasons: the inference from (1) and (2) to the conclusion rests on a bridge principle that does not work in certain circumstances, and there is good reason to reject the claim that it is wrong to abort only one fetus.
- ethics
- fetus
- philosophy
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Twin pregnancy, fetal reduction and the 'all or nothing problem’
- Twin pregnancy reduction is not an ‘all or nothing’ problem: a response to Räsänen
- Ethics of fetal reduction: a reply to my critics
- Recent developments in fetal medicine
- Recovery of second trimester pre-eclampsia after fetal reduction of a triplet
- Antenatal care for twin and triplet pregnancies: summary of NICE guidance
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- Uterine distention as a factor in birth timing: retrospective nationwide cohort study in Sweden
- Trisomy 21 in both fetuses in a DCDA twin pregnancy
- Parental obligation and compelled caesarean section: careful analogies and reliable reasoning about individual cases