Article info
PDFFeature article
Testimonial injustice in medical machine learning
- Correspondence to Giorgia Pozzi, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2628 BX, The Netherlands; g.pozzi{at}tudelft.nl
Citation
Testimonial injustice in medical machine learning
Publication history
- Received September 5, 2022
- Accepted January 2, 2023
- First published January 12, 2023.
Online issue publication
November 09, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 November 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- PDMP causes more than just testimonial injustice
- Further remarks on testimonial injustice in medical machine learning: a response to commentaries
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry
- Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome
- Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
- Epistemic virtues of harnessing rigorous machine learning systems in ethically sensitive domains
- Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice
- Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
- Designing AI for mental health diagnosis: challenges from sub-Saharan African value-laden judgements on mental health disorders