Article info
Response
Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: a reply to Miller
- Correspondence to Dr Joona Räsänen, CEPDISC - Centre for the Experimental-Philosophical Study of Discrimination, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; joona.rasanen{at}ps.au.dk
Citation
Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: a reply to Miller
Publication history
- Received December 1, 2022
- Accepted December 14, 2022
- First published December 19, 2022.
Online issue publication
October 18, 2023
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Subhumans, human flourishing and abortion: a reply to Räsänen
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Parental responsibilities and moral status