Article info
Response
Deception, intention and clinical practice
- Correspondence to Dr Nicholas Colgrove, Philosophy department and Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109, USA; colgron{at}wfu.edu
Citation
Deception, intention and clinical practice
Publication history
- Received November 9, 2022
- Accepted December 4, 2022
- First published December 14, 2022.
Online issue publication
June 22, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 December 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Pretending to care
- Deception in medicine: acupuncturist cases
- Parsing placebo treatments: a response to Barnhill and Miller
- Unintentional deception still deceives
- The ethics of placebo treatments in clinical practice: a reply to Glackin
- Medicine, lies and deceptions
- The moral case for the clinical placebo
- Neurofeedback as placebo: a case of unintentional deception?
- Effect of nicotine corrective messaging on nicotine-related beliefs in US adults: a randomised controlled trial
- Nudging, informed consent and bullshit