Article info
PDFExtended essay
Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
- Correspondence to Dr Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi, Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands; h.ismailimhamdi{at}erasmusmc.nl
Citation
Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
Publication history
- Received July 5, 2022
- Accepted November 29, 2022
- First published December 8, 2022.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Why we should not extend the 14-day rule
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life
- The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Two kinds of embryo research: four case examples
- The moral value of induced pluripotent stem cells: a Japanese bioethics perspective on human embryo research
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- How reproductive and regenerative medicine meet in a Chinese fertility clinic. Interviews with women about the donation of embryos to stem cell research