Article Text
Abstract
Formulating sound and acceptable embryo research policy remains challenging especially in a pluralistic world. This challenge has acquired a new dimension of complexity with the advent of so-called embryo models, which are derived from stem cells. In this article, we present a normative strategy to facilitate the process of sound policy-making in the field of human embryology. This strategy involves seeking neutral agreements on higher level theories and doctrines as well as seeking agreements on the level of concrete policy proposals. We call this strategy: going high and low. By going high and low, the plurality of reasonable moral and epistemic convictions of stakeholders involved in the domain of human embryology is respected while the process of policy-making in this area is improved.
- Policy
- Embryo Research
- Embryos and Fetuses
- Philosophy
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. No data are available.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. No data are available.
Footnotes
Contributors HIM authored the paper. NCR and ECAA advised HIM and provided input to improve the quality of the paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why we should not extend the 14-day rule
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life
- The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Two kinds of embryo research: four case examples
- The moral value of induced pluripotent stem cells: a Japanese bioethics perspective on human embryo research
- Stem cell-derived embryo models: moral advance or moral obfuscation?
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations