Article info
PDFResponse
Against abandoning the dead donor rule: reply to Smith
- Correspondence to Dr Adam Omelianchuk, Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; omelianchuk{at}gmail.com
Citation
Against abandoning the dead donor rule: reply to Smith
Publication history
- Received October 12, 2022
- Accepted November 17, 2022
- First published November 25, 2022.
Online issue publication
October 18, 2023
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- On the ethical permissibility of in situ reperfusion in cardiac transplantation after the declaration of circulatory death
- A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy
- The dead donor rule: effect on the virtuous practice of medicine
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- Does it matter that organ donors are not dead? Ethical and policy implications
- Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public views on death and organ donation
- Death and organ donation: back to the future
- An analysis of heart donation after circulatory determination of death
- An unquestioned assumption in the debate on the dead donor rule
- Do the ‘brain dead’ merely appear to be alive?