Article info
PDFOriginal research
Human equality arguments against abortion
- Correspondence to Dr Calum Miller, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LN, UK; c.miller{at}oxon.org
Citation
Human equality arguments against abortion
Publication history
- Received August 7, 2022
- Accepted October 30, 2022
- First published November 16, 2022.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and the basis of equality: a reply to Miller
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: a reply to Miller
- What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva