Article Text
Abstract
Physicians frequently encounter situations in which their professional practice is intermingled with moral affordances stemming from other domains of the physician’s lifeworld, such as family and friends, or from general morality pertaining to all humans. This article offers a typology of moral conflicts ‘at the margins of professionalism’ as well as a new theoretical framework for dealing with them. We start out by arguing that established theories of professional ethics do not offer sufficient guidance in situations where professional ethics overlaps with moral duties of other origins. Therefore, we introduce the moral theory developed by Christine M. Korsgaard, that centres around the concept of practical identity. We show how Korsgaard’s account offers a framework for interpreting different types of moral conflicts ‘at the margins of professionalism’ to provide either orientation for solving the conflict or an explanation for the emotional and moral burden involved in moral dilemmas.
- Ethics- Medical
- Health Personnel
- Morals
- Philosophy
- Confidentiality
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why not common morality?
- On Rhodes’s failure to appreciate the connections between common morality theory and professional biomedical ethics
- Towards a European code of medical ethics. Ethical and legal issues
- The ethical concept of medicine as a profession discovery or invention?
- A Defence of medical ethics as uncommon morality
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- The ASBH code of ethics and the limits of professional healthcare ethics consultations
- Uncommon misconceptions and common morality
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- Just compassion: implications for the ethics of the scarcity paradigm in clinical healthcare provision