In cases where the best interests of the child are disputed or finely balanced, Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) can provide a valuable source of advice to clinicians and trusts on the pertinent ethical dimensions. Recent judicial cases have criticised the lack of formalised guidance and inconsistency in the involvement of parents in CEC deliberations. In Manchester University NHS FT v Verden , Arbuthnot J set out important procedural guidance as to how parental involvement in CEC deliberations might be managed. She also confirmed substantive guidance on the role of parental views in determining the child’s best interests. We agree that it is good practice to ensure that the patient voice is heard in ethics processes, but how that is achieved is controversial. Surely it is best that what matters most to a patient and their family, whether facts or values, is conveyed directly to those considering the moral issues involved, rather than via a prism of another party. The approach suggested in the Verden case has much in common with the process used by our CEC. In this article, we commend Arbuthnot J’s approach, provide an example of its effective operation and consider what it might mean for ethics processes.
- ethics committees
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethical advice in paediatric care
- Clinic, courtroom or (specialist) committee: in the best interests of the critically Ill child?
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Achieving consensus advice for paediatricians and other health professionals: on prevention, recognition and management of conflict in paediatric practice
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?
- Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee
- Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations
- ‘Best interests’ in paediatric intensive care: an empirical ethics study
- The limits of parental responsibility regarding medical treatment decisions
- The best interests test at the end of life on PICU: a plea for a family centred approach