Responses
Current controversy
Trust and the Goldacre Review: why trusted research environments are not about trust
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 25 August 2022
- Published on: 25 August 2022Trust is dead, long live trust
I had difficulty with the Goldacre report, when it starts with the apparent contradiction of dismissing trust (in no uncertain terms). yet then proposing these TREs. (Trusted research environments). Where do the authors actually stand?
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- TREs are still not about trust
- Data for sale: trust, confidence and sharing health data with commercial companies
- Trusted research environments are definitely about trust
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK
- Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
- Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: data resource
- Verification and trust in healthcare
- Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK
- Making consent for electronic health and social care data research fit for purpose in the 21st century