Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
Trust and the Goldacre Review: why trusted research environments are not about trust
- Correspondence to Dr Mackenzie Graham, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; mackenzie.graham{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Trust and the Goldacre Review: why trusted research environments are not about trust
Publication history
- Received May 23, 2022
- Accepted August 11, 2022
- First published August 23, 2022.
Online issue publication
October 18, 2023
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- TREs are still not about trust
- Data for sale: trust, confidence and sharing health data with commercial companies
- Multiple modes of data sharing can facilitate secondary use of sensitive health data for research
- Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare
- Navigating data governance associated with real-world data for public benefit: an overview in the UK and future considerations
- Trusted research environments are definitely about trust
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK
- Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
- Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: data resource