Article Text
Commentary
Commentary on Romanis’ Assisted Gestative Technologies
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Uterus transplantation: ethical and regulatory challenges
- How useful is the category of ‘assisted gestative technologies’?
- Framing gestation: assistance, delegation, and beyond
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Assisted gestative technologies
- Should uterus transplants be publicly funded?
- Reviewing the womb
- Assisted gestative technologies, or on treating unlike cases alike
- Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies
- Clinical challenges to the concept of ectogestation