Article info
PDFCommentary
How useful is the category of ‘assisted gestative technologies’?
- Correspondence to Dr Julian Koplin, Monash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; julian.koplin{at}monash.edu
Citation
How useful is the category of ‘assisted gestative technologies’?
Publication history
- Received May 24, 2022
- Accepted May 29, 2022
- First published June 7, 2022.
Online issue publication
May 18, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 May 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Uterus transplantation: ethical and regulatory challenges
- Assisted gestative technologies
- Commercial surrogacy: how provisions of monetary remuneration and powers of international law can prevent exploitation of gestational surrogates
- Should uterus transplants be publicly funded?
- Reviewing the womb
- Surrogacy: beyond the commercial/altruistic distinction
- What is it to practise good medical ethics? A Muslim's perspective
- Framing gestation: assistance, delegation, and beyond
- Regulation of surrogacy in India: whenceforth now?
- Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers