Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Research ethics and public trust in vaccines: the case of COVID-19 challenge trials
  1. Nir Eyal
  1. Center for Population-Level Bioethics, Department of Philosophy (SAS) and Department of HBSP (SPH), Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
  1. Correspondence to Professor Nir Eyal, Center for Population-Level Bioethics, Dept of Philosophy (SAS) and Dept of HBSP (SPH), Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; nir.eyal{at}rutgers.edu

Abstract

Despite their clearly demonstrated safety and effectiveness, approved vaccines against COVID-19 are commonly mistrusted. Nations should find and implement effective ways to boost vaccine confidence. But the implications for ethical vaccine development are less straightforward than some have assumed. Opponents of COVID-19 vaccine challenge trials, in particular, made speculative or empirically implausible warnings on this matter, some of which, if applied consistently, would have ruled out most COVID-19 vaccine trials and many non-pharmaceutical responses.

  • COVID-19
  • research ethics
  • clinical trials
  • public health ethics
  • ethics

Data availability statement

No data are available.

This article is made freely available for personal use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.

https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Correction notice Since this article was first published, an acknowledgement section has been added.

  • Contributors NE has conceptualised and written this entire essay.

  • Funding This study was funded by National Science Foundation (Award # 2039320), Open Philanthropy (Award # not applicable).

  • Competing interests NE serves on the Advisory Board of challenge trial volunteer organisation 1DaySooner (a non-profit promoting human challenge trials in COVID-19), an unpaid position.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.